Sunday, July 26, 2009

Honduras, Venezuela and Cocaine


The situation in Honduras, where Manuel Zelaya, the president elected in 2005 was ousted a month ago by the country’s military forces in a Supreme Court-approved coup, may appear confusing. But it does not have to be so.

A clear explanation of what happened can be found here. The deposed president called a national referendum by presidential decree last month to change Hondura’s constitution. Some of these changes would have removed limits to the number of times the president can be re-elected (if you’re thinking of Chávez, you’re not mistaken). However, under the existing constitution, only the Supreme Electoral Tribunal has the authority to call referenda; and whoever tries to change the constitution is subject to losing all his or her constitutional powers. The Supreme Court and Attorney General called the referendum unconstitutional and proceeded to remove Mr. Zelaya from office with the assistance of the armed forces.

This is not what’s interesting. What I wanted to know was why Mr. Chávez was so involved in restoring Mr. Zelaya to the presidency—after a few weeks in exile, a defiant Mr. Zelaya crossed the Nicaraguan border into Honduras for a few hours accompanied by Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela’s foreign minister.

One possible answer of Venezuela’s interest in Nicaragua is drugs. The US Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report this month describing Venezuela as a major corridor for Colombian cocaine. In 2004, about 70 tons of cocaine crossed Venezuela and that number has quadrupled by 2009—a quarter of Colombia’s cocaine is now said to pass through Venezuela. Not to mention that Chávez’ Venezuela has been accused repeatedly with collaborating with the FARC in Colombia, and the main source of income of this terrorist organization comes from drug trafficking.

Where does Honduras come in? The Central American country is a major corridor for cocaine into Mexico. With increased air and sea monitoring, land-based routes are becoming increasingly important.

Venezuela is already collaborating with Nicaragua, which borders south of Honduras and is likewise an important drug transit hub. Daniel Ortega, Nicaragua's president and good buddy of Chavez's is one of the handful Latin American leftist rulers (next to Correa in Ecuador and Morales in Bolivia) accused of doing more than their fair share to strangle the democracies that brought them to power. They have all created constitutional assemblies to rewrite their countries’ constitutions, in a very similar way Zelaya wanted to do it.

I don’t know all things, and that’s OK. I don’t need to know all things because common sense speaks for itself. Here you have a group of leaders being accused of similar charges against democracy and human rights; there’s evidence that these men collaborate with the FARC; they all advocate anti-American sentiments and have conveniently stopped collaborating with the US on drug seizures. We’re not that dumb to ignore the ties that link all these men together, and the reasons behind their almost obsessive cooperation.

How can Venezuela continue to subsidize and literally buy out its people if oil prices are low? In a country where the only effective industry is oil and where the government buys its legitimacy with free money and gifts, how do you stay in power if you budgeted 2009 with oil selling at $120, when in fact it’s selling at half that? Cutting the budget is simply not enough! Not to mention that the more people are disgruntled, the more expensive their taste becomes.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

SWAP your Clothes and Stick it to the Fashion Industry


Did you know that the average British woman spends £1,000 a year on clothes but only wears 30% of them? That's already pretty surprising, but worse is why.

We're all looking for cheap clothes and bargains. The cheaper the clothes the better. But many of us haven't stopped to think about the consequences and ramifications of cheap clothing. Have you ever wondered why WalMart can sell you a shirt for $11.67? This post may illuminate you. Posing as textile retailers, researchers found a place in Bangladesh that was offering to make their shirt for $4.70, including the price spent on fabric, accessories, laundry, and labor. The most expensive item was the fabric at $1.35 per square yard. Only 22 cents would be directed towards labor costs (compared to the 20 cents needed for the industrial laundry!) The real price in Bangladesh was of course lower, because they were making a profit of about $1. It is unthinkable that WalMart's profit is almost 300% on this shirt, even though it is so cheap for us.

In a production cost breakdown diagram, Hemtex, a leading home textile chain in Scandinavia, shows how little of their costs go towards wages and labor in China: a meager 4%! They spend 75% on raw materials, 10% on taxes, and 11% on machines. (You can click on the diagram image on top of this post.)

What this means to the workers in underdeveloped countries is that they earn "as little as two-tenths of one percent" of the price tag on a shirt, not to mention the incredible damage that the massive textile industry is inflicting on the environment.

The logic here is that since we don't wear what we buy, we buy more, hoping we will wear that, but of course we won't, and we'll just buy more. This senseless mass production pollutes the environment through the wasted energy used to operate the entire textile process (wet processing, humidification, weaving, spinning, bleaching, dying, steaming...) In addition to that, each step leaves potential environmental hazards. "The manufacture of polyester and other synthetic fabrics is an energy-intensive process requiring large amounts of crude oil and releasing emissions including volatile organic compounds, particulate matter, and acid gases such as hydrogen chloride, all of which can cause or aggravate respiratory disease. Volatile monomers, solvents, and other by-products of polyester production are emitted in the wastewater from polyester manufacturing plants. The EPA, under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, considers many textile manufacturing facilities to be hazardous waste generators."

And to top it all off, according to the EPA Office of Solid Waste, "Americans throw away more than 68 pounds of clothing and textiles per person per year, and clothing and other textiles represent about 4% of the municipal solid waste."

That's why I like the SWAP Team so much. They help you get rid of those clothes that are still in good shape but that you just don't want to wear anymore. It's simple: You exchange those clothes for somebody else's not-used clothes, and what is not exchanged is donated. Their next SWAP event will take place in September. Check out this article on today's Gazette, their website, and their Facebook page for more information. A truly simple, effortless solution to a big problem!

Temporarily Out of Order

I've been consumed by the series Lost! We can't stop watching it. We're now at season 3, somewhere in the middle, and though these people have been on that island for 3 months, they still don't know anything, because, it seems, everyone's favorite line is either, "You don't need to know" or "It won't change anything if you know"!

I gotta give it to the writers; great business plan!